Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3696
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuthesius, Stefan-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T08:35:05Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-19T08:35:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3696-
dc.description.abstractThis article is based on what has been outlined in ‘Part I’ and on additional references to other new German work, as well as to articles by two of the protagonists of the 1870s and 1880s, Anton Springer and Moritz Thausing. The central issue is the nineteenth century’s desire for a Verwissenschaftlichung of the subject, to render the subject ‘purely scientific’. Principally this concerns the way in which older kinds of connoisseurship were juxtaposed to the new claims of a strictly ‘historical’ approach. Much shorter sections touch on aspects of style, iconography and form, as well as on the history of the provision of illustrations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDepartment of Art History, University of Birminghamen_US
dc.subjectFine Artsen_US
dc.subjectRecreationen_US
dc.subjectGeographyen_US
dc.subjectArts in generalen_US
dc.subjectAnthropologyen_US
dc.subjectAnthropologyen_US
dc.title‘Towards an “exakte Kunstwissenschaft”(?). Part II: The new German art history in the nineteenth century: a summary of some problems'en_US
Appears in Collections:Anthropology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
muthesius-report-2.pdf640.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.