Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3691
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuke, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSanders, B. F.-
dc.contributor.authorSanders, B. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-19T01:49:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-19T01:49:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3691-
dc.description.abstractFlood hazard mapping in the United States (US) is deeply tied to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Consequently, publicly available flood maps provide essential information for insurance purposes, but they do not necessarily provide relevant information for non-insurance aspects of flood risk management (FRM) such as public education and emergency planning. Recent calls for flood hazard maps that support a wider variety of FRM tasks highlight the need to deepen our understanding about the factors that make flood maps useful and understandable for local end users. In this study, social scientists and engineers explore opportunities for improving the utility and relevance of flood hazard maps through the co-production of maps responsive to end users' FRM needs. Specifically, two-dimensional flood modeling produced a set of baseline hazard maps for stakeholders of the Tijuana River valley, US, and Los Laureles Canyon in Tijuana, Mexico. Focus groups with natural resource managers, city planners, emergency managers, academia, non-profit, and community leaders refined the baseline hazard maps by triggering additional modeling scenarios and map revisions. Several important end user preferences emerged, such as (1) legends that frame flood intensity both qualitatively and quantitatively, and (2) flood scenario descriptions that report flood magnitude in terms of rainfall, streamflow, and its relation to an historic event. Regarding desired hazard map content, end users' requests revealed general consistency with mapping needs reported in European studies and guidelines published in Australia. However, requested map content that is not commonly produced included (1) standing water depths following the flood, (2) the erosive potential of flowing water, and (3) <i>pluvial</i> flood hazards, or flooding caused directly by rainfall. We conclude that the relevance and utility of commonly produced flood hazard maps can be most improved by illustrating pluvial flood hazards and by using concrete reference points to describe flooding scenarios rather than exceedance probabilities or frequencies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.subjectechnologyen_US
dc.subjectSanitary engineering |en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental technology.en_US
dc.titleGoing beyond the flood insurance rate map: insights from flood hazard map co-productionen_US
Appears in Collections:Anthropology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
nhess-18-365-2018.pdf2.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.