Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3686
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | BLÎNDA, VIORICA | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-17T08:21:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-17T08:21:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.vn:8181/dspace/handle/DHQB_123456789/3686 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study will provide a brief look into the numerous aspects of description as a unit of discourse and into the/as well as into those/distinctive discourse methods. The perspectives of the proposed analysis emphasize that description as a unit of discourse is no longer denigrated and that it has regained its well-defined place within the discourse (especially within the discourse of geography as a primary unit of discourse). The analysis is based on a corpus of studies represented by texts of geography available in geography textbooks. Through this study there will be outlined a number of methods and strategies of the discursive process through description. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Universitatea "Babeş-Bolyai" Cluj Napoca | en_US |
dc.subject | Geography | en_US |
dc.subject | Recreation | en_US |
dc.subject | Anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject | Geography | en_US |
dc.title | TYPES OF SCIENTIFIC DESCRIPTIONS IN ROMANIAN GEOGRAPHY TEXTBOOKS | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Anthropology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 viorica blinda RRGE, vol I, no 1.pdf | 424.62 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.